inated sites. Sometimes, the mere threat of liability
was enough to scare off investors.
Cleanup costs ballooned to an average of $30 million per site. The costs were high for various reasons, including expectations that sites would be
cleaned up to background levels, which are the levels of contaminants that exist in the natural environment. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 even
raised concerns for properties with potential environmental problems. However, in 1986, Congress amended CERCLA to include the innocent landowner defense. Under this, if a prospective
purchaser conducts an American Society of Testing and Materials phase I site assessment and does not discover contamination on the property, he or she is considered an “innocent purchaser” and may be
entitled to protection against CERCLA liability for undiscovered contamination. However, this defense does not offer complete protection. The gaps left by phase I investigations are being filled by
various tools, including environmental insurance. Another positive change is that regulators now take a more practical approach to remediation. Now, risk-based cleanup standards often are
used to protect human health and the environment without imposing unrealistic cleanup standards on responsible parties.
Layered Financing
Today, traditional lenders are more willing to accept brownfield properties as collateral for several reasons, including the environmental insurance products that can reduce risk and regulatory actions
that protect lenders against CERCLA liability under normal circumstances.
Brownfield developers can take advantage of various layered financing tools to make redevelopment projects
viable. These customized financial solutions—not assembly-line financing—increasingly are being used for brownfields. Decreasing the cost of money can lower both the purchase price and
cleanup costs. Layered financing involves the use of all available and appropriate sources of funding to revitalize problematic sites. Layered financing strategies can be developed from
various sources, depending on the client’s [partner’s] preference. Several options are discussed below.
Government Programs
The
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development contributes funds toward brownfield redevelopment. HUD financing can be used to leverage private capital. These funds come through various
programs including community development block grants, Section 108 loans, and the Brownfield Economic Development Initiative, which provided $50 million in grants this year.
Tax Increment Financing
Various types of tax increment financing exist nationwide. In one variety, the property tax TIF, property taxes are frozen at
pre-revitalization levels. Typically, when an area is redeveloped, property taxes rise to reflect the property’s increased market value. With TIF, the incremental property tax increase goes
toward repaying debt taken on to redevelop the property.
Old Insurance Policies
Billions of dollars in insurance coverage have not yet
been claimed. To locate or reconstruct lost insurance policies, companies must undergo a process called “insurance archaeology.” These funds can reduce the cost of financing brownfield
redevelopment.
Property Tax Abatements
Property tax bills often are the biggest fixed expense confronting a commercial property
owner. Because property taxes are based on fair market value, environmental problems can reduce the fair market value of afflicted properties.
Property taxes usually are not reduced
to reflect the extent to which environmental problems have affected value. Ensuring that each property is taxed based on its market value with all problems taken into account can make brownfield
properties more marketable.
Prospective Tax Abatements
After remediation, a property’s value generally will increase to reflect its
higher market value. Various states have enacted provisions so that property values will not jump to their post-remediation value immediately after they have been cleaned up. These laws vary
by state, but owners can be taxed at preremediation rates for up to 10 years.
Equity or Debt Swaps and Partnerships
Some remediation
firms are prepared to trade their work on a project for equity in the property. This provides the developer with equity capital that may be difficult to raise elsewhere and provides incentives to
the remediation firm to complete the project as quickly as possible.
Other strategies may include:
~ loan origination depreciation;
~ income tax credits;
~ community reinvestment act fulfillment contributions;
~ lease audits for current and previous tenancies;
~ refinancing existing bank loans;
~ utility savings; and
~ waste reclamation savings.
Brownfield Possibilities
Today, owners are more
willing to sell their brownfields. Until now, many large companies have warehoused contaminated properties because such sales were surrounded by uncertainty. But private and public
initiatives now may be able to provide vendors with more certainty. Recent innovations can help vendors profit from the sale of a contaminated property. For example, once a property has been
cleaned up, the appropriate insurance policy purchased, and assurances of no further action from regulators received, the vendor can be fairly confident that its involv